Egpu performance loss reddit. But the ballpark moves between 30% and 10% performance .

Egpu performance loss reddit This is with test systems running 7700hqs (basically best case scenario CPUs for eGPUs imo). Due to this, a 10% performance reduction at 60 FPS can baloon into a 30% performance reduction at 120 FPS, and it can get even worse. I've decided to create this post if someone somewhere is wondering what the performance loss is using the internal screen. 0 available, so performance is better (due to the power gains of Desktop GPU's over laptop The specific performance loss depends on a whole bunch of factors. Because of this the only real bump in performance you can get out of an eGPU is by outputting to an external monitor so that the bandwidth isn't being hogged by sending the output signal back through to your laptop. I used an exp gdc expresscard on my Dell and it would crash constantly unless I set it to gen 1 speeds which resulted in performance loss (gtx 960). Better performance (5-8% hit for PCI-E 4. 2 drive for about $60-80, install Steam OS or Windows on it and you'll be set. I have an i7-1260P and have had the i7-1165G7 with an RTX 3070 eGPU, and I actually had a performance gain of almost 400 to 500 points on my 3DMark Time Spy GPU scores for some reason when comparing CPUs. Think about how the video has to move. io shows a 25% performance difference. Would that CPU handle such gpus? What do you think would be the upper limit gpu? Do you know the rough performance loss using this method? I've read that using thunderbolt 3 can have anywhere from a 10-50% performance loss, so I'm curious how much is lost via this method. Edit: what you can do is to go into your bios on your current PC and restrict the pcie version to get the same bandwidth as a Thunderbolt 3/4 device would receive under ideal conditions ie around 4GB/s. In the benchmarks below the "PCI x16 2. 16gbps is just about enough to do that with 85% loss of performance compared to desktop. 0 to 4. Going into "Graphic Settings" and adding various . Unless you use RTX4090, performance loss is 10-20%, assuming that you use external monitor directly connected to GPU. I have always loved the idea of a laptop and an eGPU when playing games, allowing a flexible workspace. The results seem to indicate a minimal performance loss for the 4090 going from PCIE 4. There's also the bandwidth limitation - TB3 only has 4 PCIe lanes (instead of 16 on your typical PCIe slot). In my own experience, I've seen about 10-15% performance loss going through a thunderbolt 3 eGPU. With an Anker brand cable that was sadly more expensive and 2. EGPU No Load 100 FPS — Load 70 FPS So whenever there is load on the system (general, not GPU) the eGPU Performance suffers more. Thunderbolt has to handle only a single direction of traffic. io is the place to discuss this stuff and you might find far more detail Reddit isn't a whole lot of use but my own personal experience tells me you shouldn't have any problem with your proposal, thr USB4 stuff is thr only slight unknown but if it works as it should then it should be equally seamless as a 'normal' TB3 connection. I couldn’t get one that fit in an external enclosure. In my opinion, eGPU has always seemed like a neat add-on or a stopgap instead of a real solution. u/arcanazen shares a lot of great eGPU info in the r/legiongo sub, so check out some of their posts. If it's an egpu that connects via thunderbolt 3, you'll not notice much performance loss for most LLM (or SD) purposes. I like Oculink as that gives me the option to keep laptop bottom cover on and just plug the eGPU in as needed, just need to dremel a small port into a spare laptop bottom The optimized setup if using TB3/4 is Laptop to EGPU to external graphics. I have the ngff version of EXP GDC. ) USB 4. 0 X4 or the equivalent PCIE 2. bashrc if you use bash. In summary, the performance loss in an eGPU setup is influenced by factors such as resolution, frame rate, GPU power, and connection type. The TB3 dock was still connected throughout although I configured windows to disable the dock monitors as soon as the egpu attached monitor is connected. 0 x4 instead of Thunderbolt 4? How much performance loss occurs due to the U 30W U series processor? Ryzen 5 Pro 4650U. Reply reply GTX980 eGPU performance-is this right? I just picked up one of the Sonnet eGFX boxes to run with a spare GTX980 I have on my ThinkPad t580 (i7-8650 u/32GB/mx150/4k ). And lucky u, I study Ai and do ml work and used an egpu from Nvidia on my Mac. Then add two sticks of DDR4 2666Ghz and an m. The graphic card is 4070 ti super oc from PNY. So keep in mind that apparently the display plays a factor as well. 7 is down in priority because it is well known that there is only about at most a 5% drop in performance from 128/256 Gbps to 64 Gbps. Since the performance hit is from the eGPU having to send data back through the tb3 cable. So I'm happy to spend a bit more for portability. You basically get a 1-5% loss in most games compared to PCie 3. This explains why Benchmarks (superposition/timespy extreme) are performing as expected, but gaming suffers Last thing is performance loss, I don't know what kind of gpu I'd need since I'm losing on some performance by virtue of an egpu being a jerry-rigged setup to begin with. Why do I get about 50% performance loss with my 1060 6GB on laptop, compared to my pc? My laptop has 1050ti and one benchmark gave it 40 fps on average, when my 1060 was only 30fps average. The performance loss comes from the Thunderbolt controller, low bandwidth and insufficient CPU performance. To me the issue with eGPU: A pain to switch settings between non eGPU and eGPU Loss of portability Risk of battery dying faster due to charging a lot. The "Graphic Settings" show that my eGPU will be used, but when I start the actual game it doesn't use the eGPU and I can see that the fans aren't spinning / vram/gpu usage remains at 0. I hope it helps someone who is thinking about performance loss when having a tb3 dock connected which his egpu setup! Furthermore, if you use the radv drivers instead of amdvlk, the thunderbolt performance improves a significant bit with RADV_PERFTEST=nosam, like RADV_PERFTEST=nosam %command% on steam, or set this globally on your . 5" notebook. You can see the TB3 vs M. Oculink or NVME M2 and other solutions are much faster than Thunderbolt. The performance loss that everyone talks about with eGPUs is mainly from latency, ie that the actual data transfer rate between the gpu and the cpu is less because of the type of connection. 0x4, so you'll lose about 3/4 of the original 1/2. io. Is there something wrong? I thought that it would be only 10-20% performance loss. 0 is determined by chipset. 0 vs. Assuming you're using a screen connected to the eGPU, that means there's less information that needs to be sent over the thunderbolt cable since the CPU is mostly waiting on the eGPU to do work (and not the other way So I think I will put my monitor somewhere else and have the eGPU only + my laptop. I've been playing on loopback mode primarily, and sometimes on our TV. On PC it's 60fps average. Ive been having great performance with a thunderbolt cable. Read this article, it has some good info on active vs. BUt, even if used as an egpu, would it still have the high-performance I would need to 3D-animate and stream in OBS on my laptop? It's much better than thunder bolt and USB, very minimal loss. 0 x4 Based on this data, with a very high end card we are looking at about 6%-8% performance loss on a Gen 4. Also as others have said it probably doesn't make sense to put a 4090 in an eGPU period given the performance loss anyways. but i can tell you out of my experience: lenght of 336mm still fits, but dont go over the 3 slot width, because without tinkering its will not get into the case. e. Thunderbolt eGPUs have a significant performance loss. You can get a longer TB3 cable, but it has to be an ACTIVE TB3 cable. 0 x 4 builds I've run (with my RTX 4080 + Minisforum UM690 build being my main HPC/Gaming setup) has minimal performance loss versus desktop. There have been decent experiments with desktops and laptops with the same specs compared to each other to show this. With DLSS 3 my friend with a heavily bottlenecked system (i7-9750H with TB eGPU 4090) gets like 22 FPS native and 40 FPS with DLSS 3 at ultra settings with RT on, so if the performance translates well enough, an i7-1260P upgrade would benefit the system immensely enough as DLSS 3 effectively doubled the performance with him even if lower it’s on the lower side due to it being a rather weak I already tried: disabling my internal GPU. In fact, any gaming laptop with a Ryzen chip released before Rembrandt has only 8 lanes of PCi-E 3. And what happens if you disconnect eGPU without closing Cinema first? Will will there be performance loss if i use nvme enclosure(10gbs) to connect egpu to tb3 port ,eg if i use rtx 3060 12gbvram Question the nvme enclosure will be receiving from pLCe3. the nvme enclosure will be connected to pLCe 3. 0 x16 (32 GB/s) to PCIE 2. Depends on the GPU also, anything lower than a 3070/7700xt will be just fine anything above that will have a decent 10-15% loss Jun 5, 2023 · Thank you all for your valuable advice. 0 x 4, 4. I had my eGPU in the closet for a bit because I just thought it wasn't worth it. 2 or OCuLink eGPU, the performance increases are far greater. (Until very high frame rates) EXAMPLE: Say Game X runs with 72 FPS in desktop and 60 FPS in eGPU. 39K subscribers in the eGPU community. 5m will give reduced performance. Try lowering the resolution, confirming that your power profile is set to high performance, and try switching between rendering engines (DX11 vs DX12). Less than - 8% max and about 4% loss on average. Major Performance loss - RX 570 i have been using my 570 for about a month, about a week ago i went to go stream like i do daily and all of a sudden everything was lagging (it never used to do this) i checked my temps which were normal and ever since then the performance has just stayed at this point. My personal suggestion would be to get a stronger single card to drive the monitor using one of the ADT eGPU adapters. 0 link (relative to a x16 connection) with a very high end card. They're throttled a lot. To run an eGPU with an external monitor, the graphics data needs to be passed one way to the eGPU. I have a blade 15 (base 2019) with a 1660ti in it, I love it but I want better FPS in my games and the 3060ti seems like the best card for me and my budget. TB3 is more than enough bandwidth to handle an gpu as long as you are connecting the display to the gpu. The problem is, the 7800XT is generally a long card due to the heat sink and fan cover. SO the eGPU with a 3080 ti without a DOUBT boosts performance especially paired with a larger monitor. I wonder, how 4090 will do. Jan 29, 2024 · Starting with the flagship GeForce RTX 4090 and the Time Spy benchmark, there was a 23% performance loss when using the internal display. So far it is running great. You should be able to find benchmarks at different pcie speeds to compare for yourself. But the ballpark moves between 30% and 10% performance Performance loss I have an Aorus Gaming Box with an RTX 2060 inside it, connected to my Thinkpad X1 Carbon gen 8 with a i5-10310U and 8 gb of RAM. 0 X 16 bandwidth. With PCI-E 4. 0 was superior to AGP because AGP capped at 8x PCI bandwidth while PCIe 1. The peripherals will be using bandwidth from the TB3 cable that your GPU will be needing. Then you adapt that into thunderbolt, which supports a 3. If I'd need a proper modern graphics, may as well go all the way and build a desktop for the price Performance loss over TB depends on the game and your resolution, if internal screen or external. If you boost your price a bit you can find a barebone Hades Canyon NUC for about $450. 0x4 I am just going to calculate the performance loss with hypothetical numbers just out of my head. My 3070 is supposed to get like a 15,000 Time Spy GPU score but it gets now a 12,800. Hello!, im thinking of buying a RTX 4060. Passive cables longer than ~0. Expect about a 20-60% performance loss in AAA titles released after 2018 (with a few exceptions, God of War is an exception, for example) and about 10-20% for esports and older AAA titles. With the eGPU the performance loss is roughly 10-20% as people said here, but what is the performance loss for data going back and forth in the same cable for my eGPU to laptop? Also is there any added input delay since since there is more traffic? Thanks 🙏 So I sold my old laptop as well as the mainbaord, CPU and RAM of the Desktop and gave the eGPU setup a shot. See link in comment below comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment While you can set the eGPU to output any refresh rate it is capable of, and in that sense, the monitor will work just fine, an eGPU takes a larger performance hit at high framerates than at lower ones. To your answer, for docking reasons. this shows that with the 4090 in a razer core x you get about 30% performance loss which is equivalent to a RTX 3090TI in performance. With eGPU we have 20-50% performance drop on Internal and External Display and this is great, because with GTX 1060, GTX 1070, GTX 1080 & GTX 1080Ti even with this performance drop - we can play all heavy games with 60FPS: Hey all, wondering if anyone has seen some good stats on potential performance loss on thunderbolt 1 vs 2/3? I've seen some stats about gaming, but as far as I know rendering seems to suffer less via thunderbolt vs rendering tasks. 7 foot cable that came with the eGPU dock, performance was within 5% of the Anker cable at 85 FPS. io)), I cannot really recall results before doing these mods. But I never got into it because of the 20-30% performance loss from eGPU. The price od a 3070 is the same as the 4060, but i was analyzing and the 3070 is more powerful than the 4060 but also the 4060 uses a pcie 4 x 8 compared with pcie 4 x 16 of the 3070, does this "less pcie lines" aply to "better operation on thunderbolt3" ?, im more interested in frame stability so if i can get 60 stable fps i prefer compared to raw power. This would be a single 1 direction output so that theres no loss of signal for upstream data. It's actually better to connect it to your laptop than to the eGPU itself. it doesn’t have pd out. 2 and Thunderbolt 5 are supposed to give us the best of both worlds, but they are likely releasing next year. 2 feet long, performance increased to 82 FPS. This might change in the future though. Setting was on ultra detail. TB5 is three years out of the mainstream so don't hold your breath. Currently, I'm getting ~50-60FPS and don't want to dip below that. How much of a loss in performance (if you can quantify it somehow) is there between putting a card into an eGPU over TB3 vs directly into a machine? Depends on too many variables to provide a simple answer. 0 and if you stay with Apple and ever upgrade to Apple Silicon the egpu will be useless because they will probably never support other GPU maker again. I bought a used Razer Core X Chroma on eBay for a little under $200 and also ordered a new XFX RX 7800 XT but I'm now second guessing the GPU purchase as the more I research on USB4/TB3 and the limitations, I feel that the performance loss on the card will be pretty steep. 5m passive cable. I'm planning to buy a mini ITX in a few months, meanwhile I'm playing on my PS5, and sometimes I'm buying one month of GeForce Now. 0 x 4 you lose about 1-5% performance depending on GPU, game and Don't get me wrong, I spent days researching differences in performance, and whether 10 FPS would make such a huge difference that it would warrant a difference of €200. This is the realm of say 3080 tier+ GPUs used in the eGPU. This results in ~15% performance loss compared to desktop, though it could be more or less depending on workload. This translates to 22% performance loss on 1% lows and 16% performance loss on average using a internal display vs external I’m building an eGPU for my MacBook Pro 15 inch 2018 model with a 6800xt and an external display. On the other hand, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super only lost 10% of its I am wondering the type of performance loss and what bottlenecking i would have. When you put that into a egpu, most egpu enclosures support only 3. I've pre-ordered the Valve Index HMD and am looking to get great performance for the upcoming No Man's Sky VR update. The main difference isn't really in TB3 vs TB4, but in the fact that Ice Lake and Tiger Lake CPUs have an on-die Thunderbolt controller. Therefore, the performance loss is more pronounced when aiming for higher frame rates at lower resolutions compared to lower frame rates at higher resolutions. It shouldn't be a drastic effect, but why lose even more performance when from the GPU you're already losing so much through TB3 already? That's the only real leg up I see some of it's competitors having, because generally they are more expensive for less performance (Valve is basically selling at cost or possibly even at a loss) and usually much less performance per watt as well. For example the HP 255 G8 45R27ES would be great if an eGPU is possible without losing too much performance to bandwidth and latency. 0 was 533mb/s, which I thought was the bandwith of plain old PCI, and PCIe 1. I am wondering how much the loss would be if I had a Razer X Chroma enclosure with say, a 3080, 3080 Ti, 3090, 3090 Ti. Does anyone know the expected performance loss when using these solutions? For compute workloads there is usually no performance loss. USB4 : worse performance (15-60% hit), most of the time plug in and play. I'm wondering how much performance I'll lose when repurposing my desktop RX 6750XT into an eGPU through its thunderbolt 4-compliant USB-C port (assuming it actually supports eGPUs on it, since the Ally X will still have their proprietary eGPU port). They're taking one data point (Thunderbolt has reduced performance over a direct connection) and extrapolating it beyond reality to look smart—and ironically revealing their own misunderstanding instead. 1. 0 (though, if possible, I want to wait until PCIe 5. 2: Please no selling/trading of eGPUs, video cards, power supplies and other hardware. Still you have a loss of 75% available bandwidth. I'm not willing to compromise on performance or latency. I have a laptop with an eGPU and am considering what graphics card to put in that enclosure. And more performance loss due to the eGPU bandwidth. But the post on egpu. I'm waffling between graphics card choices, however. What's worse is the performance can be pretty hit and miss if you have a ULV quad core or weak H-series chassis as the eGPU could end up CPU bottlenecked as well. Usually more on the 30% side. So with the longest cable and 90 degree adapter, performance took approximately a 46% hit at 58 FPS. Use an eGPU if you have a lot of displays. 0 will work with Thunderbolt 3 eGPU housings? Getting a solid 60fps in AAA titles with a thunderbolt eGPU setup is hard. The 4080 from pcie 4x16 to 3x4 is only a 6% drop in performance, on a tb4 setup this would be more like a 35-40% drop, if tb5 has a faster controller with less latency, then expect better performance regardless of added bandwidth. First i used it for 2 months with an external display Recetly Ive been using it just with the laptops screen. If you use the eGPU with a monitor attached to it the PC sends the raw data to the GPU, the GPU does all its fancy math, then sends the video out to the monitor directly. So that's like a 15% performance loss in theory Just a note: The 3DMark is not a good measure of performance loss. io sources and have found that with a lower end card there's not a great deal of difference between internal and external display performance (like 20% vs 10-15%), and that x2 vs x4 lanes is unlikely to make a big difference. No there’re no performance loss, Blade 15 2018 which doesn’t support power delivery performs even slower than stealth late 2019 that charge the laptop. 0 x 16 with M. The NVME PCI-E 4. And then if I found I didnt like the lower settings and reprojection in VR I would plump for desktop 4090 eGPU via M2>Oculink (PCIE 4. TB5 should be comparable, but with plug-in-play and power delivery. Laptop + eGPU using only external monitor The first scenario, you have a "solid" gaming laptop, with some high performance CPU and a dedicated (internal) GPU. 0 was a double in bandwidth. Having had both, and the cost is similar, I’d say the 7800xt. Specs: Razer Core X Chroma (700W) w/ RTX 2070 Super External 144Hz 1920x1080 Monitor (connected w/ DisplayPort) MacBook pro 16" with i9 9980HK (8 cores) How much performance loss occurs if an egpu is connected via PCIe® NVMe®, PCIe 3. Even tests a 4090 I only have an eGPU for shits and giggles (Had a spare card and I wanted one for my Win Max that I never ordered). Please note that I had a 2C/4T i5-6360U in my laptop and a 4C/4T i5-4460 in my desktop. Reply reply See here ( 2018 15″ Dell XPS 15 9570 (GTX1050Ti) [8th,6C,H] + GTX 1080 Ti @ 32Gbps-TB3 (ASUS XG Station Pro) + Win10 1809 [itsage] | External GPU Builds (egpu. What kind of Performance loss can i expect If i want to drive a 1440p 240hz display over pcie 4. 3080+ GPUs aren't worthwhile to run in an eGPU for gaming - too much performance loss. You could step down to a RTX xx70 card, spend the savings + eGPU enclosure cost on the rest of the desktop, and get a much better performing setup. Sorry for my confusion, but I thought one lane of PCIe 1. I made a video showing performance loss using internal vs external monitor and also different card performance. We are not a trading subreddit, and do not want to have to deal with the fallout of potential sale issues in our community. There isn't much of a loss for 3D rendering. For gaming there is usually more loss the higher the frame rate - but usually in a pretty linear fashion. Test my ten year old 4 core 8 thread i7 Sandy Bridge laptop with expresscard GDC Beast on various eGPU's. PCIe 3. 0 x16 (8 GB/s) so I guess that means PCIE 4. In fact at one point I had two eGPUs, both 3090's, hanging off a couple of thunderbolt 3 ports on an Intel NuCs giving me 48gb of VRAM and very fast inference. It's the lower bandwidth of thunderbolt that creates a performance bottleneck. 0" score is the one which most closely represents Oculink 4i performance. Hello! I'm interested in buying the ROG Ally X when it launches, and I'm new to the whole eGPU ecossystem. On another note, whatever money you save, you can spend it on games. I would advise you to get the oculink add on for the framework and get a oculink egpu dock and enjoy max 4-5% Performance loss I wanted to ask if there is a performance loss when using the built in usb hub on the razer Core x chroma. Planning to connect RX480 or RX580, but nothing too powerful. io don't have the links). I see 10-25 percent as a generalized number for performance loss thrown around quite a bit when talking about eGPU performance. Hello, I recently bought a Razer Core X (Non Chroma) with the GPU which is the Gigabyte Eagle RTX 3080 TI with 12 GB Gddr6x. loss of FPS between external monitor & internal display? Let's say a eGPU setup produce 60 FPS on an external monitor in any given game - would there be a reduction of 5, 10, 15, 20 or more FPS using the internal display? I chose ADT-ut3g because it was the only usb 4 egpu board on the market(I couldn’t find any) but. games that run at 200+ fpson fullp pc run at 90 to 120 fps on egpu, recent games such as The Last of us, run s at 120+ fps on full pc runs at 30 to 45 fps on egpu. You can compare results with the TPU PCIe scaling articles. Timespy Score Comparison Mantiz Saturn II Pro eGPU Does it matter which EGPU encolsure u choose? and if you are gonna pick a low budget gpu enclosure would you get any performance loss or does it solely rely on how powerful the gpu is (ik tb3 would make you loose performance) Setting the card into "maximum performance mode" removes this Just take care about the size and if it fits in the chroma. 99% people don't actually take the time at all to do their own research before asking. 0 so minimal performance loss through M2. Also, a single hub in between will not give a devastating performance loss. I see, what is the general consensus for the amount of performance loss, i. Everything is working fine; however, I'm experiencing some stuttering, for example, when my game drops from 230 to 170 FPS, even though I lock the framerate at 60 FPS and it appears to remain stable (according to Afterburner). Hoping to be able to keep the 3090 FTW3 as cool as possible while still having an eGPU that is as quiet as possible as well, with negligible performance loss compared to sticking the 3090 FTW3 into a x16 PCI slot in the PC. Also is there a 'performance cap' when you use eGPUs which results in the same performance across the board regardless of how high end of a GPU I buy (i. Does someone have any real numbers on the performance loss ? the only benchmark i saw was the comparasion of an internal laptop 3070 and an EGPU 3070 and the EGPU 3070 was always >20% faster than the internal. passive cables. Though, the 3080 is quite a hefty gpu, just below the beast that is the 3090. Even on modern platforms with integrated controllers and my 4080, there are drops below 60fps in many AAA titles roughly 10-15% of the time. 0 x 4; 15-30% for PCI-E 3. 100 fps in overwatch when using a 1070, 100 fps when using a 1080, 100 fps when using a 2070 etc) Can I run more displays on integrated graphics without performance loss? So I've got a plan to eventually run a triple monitor setup out of my laptop using an M. So yes it’s a viable option but you still face a performance loss. Now just have to decide which Lenovo Legion to buy! Two different concepts. But how about Desktop GPU vs EGPU ? I'm well aware that my eGPU setup is limiting the performance of my GPU. eGPU: External Graphics Discussion Don't be as concerned with the actual % performance loss, but rather instead focus on performance dollar loss. Best way is to connect your egpu to another screen. 2 PCIe 4. Not bad! With PCIE 4. So that's it basically. I decided to give up the eGPU concept because of the performance vs investment thing. That will still slow it down. Almost nothing to do with your existing independent GPU or anything else. I don't know the exact performance different but a pc would be more future proof long term, it a new gen with pcie 4. Feb 25, 2017 · To us eGPU users, the performance loss compared to a desktop is negligible. I code and all on macos and then boot into windows and run my projects using cuda. You might want to invest on a gaming rig that's capable of 1080p gaming and keep your notebook PC for work and travel. I have a rtx 3080ti running at 1440p. Reply reply Or is the performance loss different with different GPUs. But yeah, most of the perf loss in an eGPU is bandwidth and deficiencies with TB3. eGPU's tend to have less performance loss at higher resolutions because the compute burden gets pushed more heavily to the GPU. Look for cables marked "active" which should minimize loss. Best (least) loss would be something like 3060ti/3070 playing at 4k. io- they only i have an external monitor and i have heard that that makes performance better as well so take that in mind Thanks, I really appreciate your answer. pretty sure that your "problem" (if there even is one) has already been solved either here or on egpu. While it does work, the performance loss is so significant that it is not faster than the 4090 mobile, neither in the Razer Blade with TB3 and the powerful CPU nor the Legion Go with its slower CPU but much higher USB4 bandwidth. Can it even fit Razer Core? :) Interesting that CB 24 shows better acceleration than real life scenes. As always: eGPU. The biggest bottle neck is the CPU since Intel processors don't reach the same boost frequency on Apple hardware. 2 Forza Horizon 4 FPS differences from links in my sig. And if your laptop's moniter is connected to your iGPU meaning that you have to use iGPU to output data to the moniter, you might also have loss from the iGPU. Same game with a more powerful graphics card might go from 120 FPS to 100 FPS. Despite that fact that it is the mobile variant of the RTX 3080; Asus developed a proprietary connector that combines USB 3. about 20-30% loss with thunderbolt vs. Posted by u/De-Ruyter - 1 vote and 2 comments I’ve updated drivers, cleaned my pc (physically and storage wise) and use unpark cpu. Jan 29, 2024 · The reviewer observed 5% lower performance with the internal display and zero performance loss with an external display. Egpus are better at pushing pixels than fps. I tried researching online but most tests I’ve seen are with ultra books with 4 core CPU’s and I have yet to see any testing with 8 core CPU’s. With the eGPU, you are looking to push this setup to rival quite high end desktops (graphically at least). Aug 18, 2024 · /r/eGPU: External Graphics Discussion /r/eGPU Rules: 1: Posts must be related to eGPUs (External Video Cards). However in my own testing, the number seems to be closer to 35-40 percent in most games. 2 or OcuLink eGPU. Our first product is the Framework Laptop, a thin, light, high-performance 13. 0 x4 oculink? "i took a look your comments" 🤓☝🏽 sir my life doesn't belong to reddit, as difficult to comprehend as it may be for you. 0 x16 doubled it. I wanted to share some observations from my preliminary testing looking at TB3 eGPU performance in comparison to desktop performance for both high end (GTX 1070) and low end (GTX 750ti) GPUs. Only thing I did different with the G7 was, it came with a display cable and not an HDMI cable. That's better than a 3090 TI in a desktop at PCIE 4. 0 x4 (8GB/s) should be pretty darn close to desktop performance for the 4080. eGPU enclosures alone can almost cost that much. 3. The 980 is detected, it shows 100% utilization in hwinfo, it gets appropriately warm, etc. This goes for both AMD and NVIDIA cards in boot camp. However, with an external display, the performance hit Jan 1, 2025 · However, a pressing question looms: Do you lose performance when using an eGPU compared to a traditional internal GPU? In this article, we will explore the complexities of eGPU performance, outlining both the potential drawbacks and the benefits of using an external graphics card. 5m cables because they can be passive (and therefore cheaper) with minimal losses. If your workload is very bandwidth intensive (I know some workstation loads can be), you're even more likely to see a much worse performance loss. The results of the tests typically compare the score results to calculate the performance drop hence why we always say "TB3 eGPUs limit performance by 10 You'll probably always have a 5-15% performance loss on an eGPU but also remember using a portable CPU is also going to be a huge factor. withe the rtx 2060 only a few games reached 60fps. Your laptop 2080 is likely still going to be the one you want to use, the eGPU is mostly for lesser systems. 0x16, so you'll lose about 1/2 the potential bandwidth of the card, because 3. Worst loss would be 4090 playing at 720p on a high refresh rate monitor. A ultrabook + eGPU beats my old desktop in graphics score which had a i7-11700KF and a 3090. The eGPU then sends that out to the external monitor. Anyone else notice this? Using an eGPU on a desktop is possible assuming the desktop has a Thunderbolt port. Oculink: Not plug in and play. Any updates and input would be greatly appreciated. some games above 120 fps, most games around 90 to 120 fps, recent demanding games 60 to 90fps, a few games below 60fps. Jun 5, 2023 · Though I concur with @wildfear, if you have capability of a M. 2 gen 2 for the "dock" portion of the EGPU; with the displays, usb ports, ethernet etc utilizing this connection AND while also developing a proprietary PCI That's not how Thunderbolt works. , but the performance I'm getting is lower than I expected. Was pleasantly surprised to see that the performance loss is something I think I can live with now with newer CPUs. 7600M XT is almost identical to rtx4060 at gaming, most 3A games would run 90+ fps at high settings, but there may be performance loss if you are using internal screen, especially on USB 4. And when I connect to my laptop, it seems like that the performance is worse, even worse than the laptop GPU. officially 330mm lenght and 3 slot wide fits into the chroma. 0 GPUs release for 128 Gbps), I could be pushing the Yes you will experience a performance loss, but “bottlenecks” with eGPUs aren’t like a hard cutoff where you’re 100% limited by the CPU/thunderbolt and the GPU makes no difference. No loss in bandwidth though. What is the performance difference between this and a desktop 6800xt setup in gaming and after effects. . 0 X16 there is about 8-10% performance loss at 4k resolutions. With the 1. Roughly %15 loss for being a mobile gpu and at least %25 performance drop for not being connected to an external monitor and these numbers are me being optimistic(you can look these up on egpu. However, since PCIe x4 is limited to 64 Gbps for PCIe 4. 0 x 4 versus. This a a rough goal, as the performance loss can be quite If the performance loss is too high (idk, >25%?) then I would probably rather invest in my desktop. Each hop adds a couple microseconds’ round trip time. From my understanding USB4 Version 2. This could just be due to exp gdc being a bad egpu dock since I now use a pe4c mini pcie dock and have had 0 crashes Good luck I'm confident enough in this after having watched and read a bunch on eGPU's that the performance loss going from an 8700K and RTX 3080 to the LeGo with my 3080 externally connected will be negligible and in some cases may even be better due to the more performative CPU and increased core count. Unless you're using TB3 (even that has a ~20% performance loss), an eGPU doesn't really make sense. That significantly reduces the latency of taking to a TB3 device, and improves eGPU performance. There's still going to be some performance loss going over USB4 but should be better than a TB3 enclosure. (5% at most) For machine learning, it depends on how the specific algorithm/modeling process uses the CPU. As I was just saying in another thread: performance for eGPU's vary greatly game to game, and BF1 may just be one of the games where the performance loss is most serious. Being able to plug in an eGPU would've made it a real do-it-all PC. That’s the only bummer thing. Yes, there can be losses. It’s half the performance of my 4090, which is a good thing considering the 4070 was less than that. EXEs for my games and setting them to 'performance mode'. The game is Strange Brigade, set at max settings 1080p Setup is: Dell XPS 9370 i7-8550u with EVGA 1060 3GB in Razer Core X egpu enclosure. Basically, most boxes come with . The 'cost benefit analysis' for egpu's are so subjective that only you are able to answer if the performance costs are worth going with an egpu. 0 x 16. It isn't a major issue in this case, since this is a native PCIe link (instead of Thunderbolt), but I thought I'd mention it. So you’ve run it where the eGPU is running it back to your display on the Win 3, right? And it works without stuttering or anything related to running it back to the device display? I’m fine with the performance loss because at that screen size and resolution it’s still going to hit 60+ fps with everything jacked to a ultra and RTX enabled. Just ignore anyone who claims GPU X is the most performance you'll get out of it. the performance should be similar between Laptop + eGPU and only using laptop screen Laptop + eGPU using laptop and external monitor Both would be less performance compared to 3. for me yes it is , My dgpu is a rtx2060 lapto gpu and I have much better performance with egpu rtx 3080 ti at 1440p with 1400p 165hz external monitor. I know there will be a performance drop, but there shouldn’t be this much. I know very well that I will have at least some performance loss, so the 3080 probably won't perform as much as I could expect. Hi, I've got a Thinkpad T470 (x2 lanes, 7200u) and want to play on the internal display. Between 0 and 30% in my experience. I'm pretty new to this egpu thing, but I have a coolermaster Mastercase eg200 with a gtx1070 inside. Performance depends on how faster and less bandwidth penalty gpu data transferred to cpu, in my case blade 15 goes first to vrm controller before to cpu, on stealth it’s directly to cpu Looks like portable laptop + eGPU should be very reasonable setup for moderate 3D work. I ran a test when I got my box set up last year and the 2m active cables were fairly close to the performance of the . Discussion around the Framework mission of building products that last longer by making them upgradeable, customizable, and repairable. eGPU testing was done with the Aorus Gaming Box. As someone who owns the Rog Flow 2022 and the XG Mobile RTX 3080; the XG Mobile is an AMAZING feat of engineering. Cause then I would just go for the regular Core x instead. You can search here on the subreddit and find videos and information about the performance analysis. If anyone here has a 3060ti in an eGPU (or a 3070) can anyone give me a rough performance percentage loss in gaming from having it externally. Question: If I salvage the card from my old build, should I expect a performance loss or gain? Will frame-time be an issue? I don't have a framework laptop yet though I plan on getting one, but was wondering if anyone was able to get an egpu to work without any performance loss on the framework, I know it has been said there will be performance loss with egpu, but I heard there are those that had minimal performance loss and it seems some had zero performance loss, and was later told the varying results is because Remember: 3060Ti/3070 equate to the 2080/2080 Ti in performance, and the egpu sweetspot was the 2070 last gen Only thing that changed were prices, the cards just moved 2 tiers below, yet guess what, sweetspots for eGPU still managed to rise. I've seen a 1080Ti eGPU beat a 3060Ti eGPU just because the latter used a ULV quad core laptop, which is probably why Unigine benchmarks are the standard over at eGPU. egpu's have x amount of combination, and that x amount is infinite. My assessment is the max you need for an eGPU on a laptop is an RTX 4070ti go get that and wait for 15th Gen Intel CPUs with TB5 to reassess. I would argue that if we're looking at a $2000 RTX 3090 Ti, even at a lowballed performance loss of 30%, the performance dollar loss of over $600 is "not worth it" in most cases given that you could literally build an entire PC minus $350 - $450 isn't enough to get a PC and an eGPU. Workflow has less performance drop with egpu than gaming thus egpus work better for workflow vs gaming. That means performance actually improved enough to use something better. I managed to turn off the eGPU by disabling USB in the BIOS after shutting down the PC. Going from a 3060 up to a 3060Ti would still provide more performance for example. It consistently shows less loss than a lot of gaming scenarios in my experience. I also know my cpu bottlenecks my 960, but in GPU reliant games like overwatch it shouldn’t will there be performance loss if i use nvme enclouse(10gbs) to connect epu to tb3 port ,eg if i use rtx 3060 12gbvram eg if i use rtx 3060 12gbvram. If you can deal with 1-3, you get better performance for most games. I've done a bit of research on eGPUs and a bit of interpolation from egpu. Is this viable? You're going to lose about 15-30% performance with this setup versus desktop depending on GPU, game and settings. Time spy graphic score is around 21,500 so it is around 88-90% of desktop performance I think. However these are things specific to any pc and do not fix the eGPU performance loss. rzujh cyxx jgs wgxgg rjpols klujx rqcs legcgz ypux kux