Reviews completed after major revision On March 24, it changed to Required Reviews Completed, and then, changed to Decision in Process. Recently. 11 Editor assigned 5. Till now, there is no further update and the status is unchanged. 5 accept Nov 8, 2015 · I can see two reasons why a reasonable referee might request a second major revision after you've addressed all the issues raised in the first report. 28, 5. For this, while submitting the cover letter (to the The peer review history package includes the complete editorial decision letter for each revision, with reviews, and your responses to reviewer comments, including attachments. May 14, 2015 · Upon checking, I noticed that some reviewers have yet to submit their reviews. In some cases, the AE may again send the manuscript for peer review. One of the referee suggested minor revision, while the other suggested major revision. Only two comments were addressed before the review process was considered complete on April 17, 2022. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting Apr 5, 2022 · 2021/12/28 Required Reviews Completed 2021/12/30 Major revision 2022/01/19 revision submitted 2022/01/25 under review 2022/02/18 revision submitted 2022/02/24 accept Nov 2, 2023 · Our paper underwent a second minor revision after the first major revision. 5. If there was going to be a rejection, after the reviewers grading, your article would have been rejected. 24 Reviews Completed 2021. Describe the major revisions to your manuscript in your response letter followed by point-by-point responses to the comments raised. I am having somehow the same problem, the situation is: I have sent my article three months ago for a second revision and they send me the same tracker service, but in my case: Reviews completed:1 Reviews accepted 1:1 Reviews sent:2 It has been two months now and this status remains the same with 1, 1, 2 And I don't know what to do in this regards. The opinions of the two reviewers were alright, and I spent a month and a half making the revisions. I have received minor comments (only a few text corrections) from the referee who suggested major revision at the 1st review. After major revision we have submitted the manuscript back and it went to with editor to under review after one day and to required reviews completed after 2 weeks and then again to under review after 1 day. 6. After making the necessary adjustments, I resubmitted the revised manuscript on the 21st of November. 2. 2021. However, the editor has sent out another review invitation (#5 Reviewer). May 28, 2020 · After submission, I got a major revision decision from two reviewers. On the other hand, I also had a minor revision, that in the end turned out to require a significant (>50%) rewriting of the paper that took quite some time; I'd definitely classify it as major revision. 05 Under Review 2022. 28 major revision 3 reviewers 8. 06. Now, again it At the 1st review, the referees' have written positive statement. The latter happened to me once as a guest editor. 10 Resubmit 2021. October 25: The Nov 18, 2020 · Reviews Completed means that the peer review of the manuscript is complete. Share . 7 - Required reviews completed 2021. For all subsequent steps, please check Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance. The status changed to With Editor on February 28 and to Under Review on March 2/3. If it is rejected after review, you can use the feedback for improvements. I received a major revision of one of my articles. 02 Under review on 4. I was wondering about the chances of the manuscript being Mar 15, 2016 · Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. " 2022. 28 required reviews completed Feb. Is it positive sign. This could mean one of the following: 'reject', 'submit as new', 'major revision, 'minor revision' or 'accept' (Depending on the journal, options may change). Submitted response to review comments on March 26, 2022. However, the short period of time since submission seems to suggest that this is a rapid publication journal or that the peer review was done internally (in case I edited my manuscript as they suggested and submitted the revised version. If you should withdraw is another matter, but my default is to submit the revision to the journal whenever possible. Now my Jul 8, 2019 · After resubmitting my revised manuscript on 20th of June, the status changed to 'under review' after only 4 days and then after 6 days (on 30th of June) it changed to 'required reviews completed. I revised and resubmitted. Usually, an article being assigened to an editor after review is a good thing. I want to know about the differenc between with editor and required reviews of completed after under review. See the screenshot for an example. 13 Resubmitted with editor 2022. We have revised the manuscript again responding to all the third reviewer highlighted points (some points are not responsible for that reason we submitted a rebuttal letter to the editor before sending the revision). 8 revised manuscript submitted 8. However, in the tracking site it displayed 'Major Revision' probably as a norm - though frankly there was nothing major in the suggested revisions and both reviewers actually used the term 'minor' in their reports ! It took us no more than two days to do all suggested changes and Dear Devnath Shah your original question "After submitting major revision, The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed to with editor again for last 10 days. If recommending revision, state specific changes you feel need to be made. 11. Does this mean it got sent to reviewers or the editor is evaluating it? Any experience here? It’s an Elsevier journal. If your paper is rejected before review due to being out of scope, the best way forward is to find a new journal for your work. 28 Under review 2022. THANKS!! Jan 11, 2022 · 2021. 13 Required reviews completed 4. I have already addressed 4 peer-reviewers, and in my last submission I addressed the comments of the 4th reviewer. After 14 days, I received the decision [communication] that both the reviewers agreed that I had addressed their questions and that the paper could be published. The first peer review process was completed after one month and a major revision was the decision. Jul 30, 2019 · The status of your manuscript indicates that the review for your revised paper is complete. If the initial revision was a major revision, there may be another round of major/minor revision requested on resubmission. 19 reviewers assigned, 2. Most submitted manuscripts go through a meticulous review process by several reviewers who are experts in the given subject; these reviewers may request major or minor revisions or even reject the manuscript. I have been checking the online submission status and 6 days ago, it was updated to "Required Reviews Completed". e. Now, again it After peer review, the editor makes a decision based on the reviewer(s) recommendation(s) and their own assessment, which can be any of the following: A-accept (almost never after the first review round) B-minor revisions required (no further formal external peer review round required, editor makes decision) C-revise & re-review Minor revision might also include providing more accurate explanations for some of the results or adding more results of control experiments that can be easily performed, that are not critical to supporting conclusions and that might not need further peer review for validation. Some of the main concerns were related to the Dec 2, 2024 · A column appears for each revision showing the status of each listed individual. Common Reasons for Getting A “Major Revision” Decision. So I'm wondering which one this response is. 4 - Under review 2021. Also time taken to evaluate reviewer recommendation by editor – Sep 2, 2022 · 1. You must have received positive reviews. What does that mean? Does it mean the manuscript has been assigned to a new reviewer and Jun 19, 2020 · Now, after a month, the status has changed to ‘Required Reviews Completed,’ which as the term suggests, means that the peer review has been completed. Then, the status changed to Required Reviews Completed. But the status was again changed to "editor assigned". October 5: I submitted the revised manuscript. The status said "reviews completed" (2 reviewers sent their reports). 18th of July, the status is showing “Editor assigned. Since then it has been 2 months, but yet to receive the decision. After I sent the revised manuscript, the status was ‘’with editor’’ and did not change for two weeks. After the paper was in the With Editor status for about a month, it went to Under Review for about four months. To date, the status is “under review”. I made the necessary adjustments and resubmitted it again. Aug 10, 2021 · I sent a manuscript to a high reputation Elsevier journal. 30 Revised 5. September 15: I received a major revision recommendation. LinkedIn. 15 Under review 2022. 25 required review completed Quality Journals take at least 6 months to complete review and acceptance. I sent the revised version, and the editor said he would let us know the decision after referee's recommendation. Dec 7, 2021 · Required reviews completed after minor revision. One recommended major revision, two recommended minor revision, and one recommended acceptance. Apr 15, 2019 · After the review process, editor is assigned to check the quality of the paper and the reviewers comments. 1 - With editor 2021. 9 Major revision 2022. Your options It is very uncommon for manuscripts submitted to peer-reviewed journals to be accepted directly, without a request for revision. 表示审稿意见已经返回给编辑，等编辑处理。这一步也叫With editor。 The manuscript was sent back to the reviewers as it was a major revision. The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed In another example, I would complain if my paper is still not under review after one month, but it’s fine if it is under review at that time. After 50 days of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested” and that the new version was required within one month. Does the status Decision in Process mean or imply a Reject decision in this case? Jul 10, 2016 · Sometimes, after the first round, a reviewer notices sometimes more important, and can ask for a major revision (or a reject). Mar 5, 2017 · Recently, I submitted a paper to a journal. Facebook. Now, again it The full manuscript will be accessible after the review assignment is accepted. 31 Required reviews completed 2. If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, together with your responses. Required Reviews Completed. Trade book publishing and are required completed after major revision surgery is misconduct on a fair shake, in the comments. It sucks when you get positive reviews with comments you can easily address, only for the editor to reject the Oct 1, 2024 · Note that once completed reviews for your submitted article have been received and are under evaluation by the handling Editor the status may later return to 'Under Review' if additional reviews are sought. In case of a rejection, an article transfer will be considered. Twitter. download a PDF of the manuscript for review and to upload their completed review. 19 with editor Jan. Now my question is if it is rejection then the editor would immediately send the rejection Sep 9, 2018 · After second revision (minor), I felt that the title was too long. I fulfilled the revisions and sent the manuscript on 10. Next, the associate editor (AE) will go through the peer review comments and make a decision on your paper, whether to send it you for a minor/major revision or to reject it. (1) Your revision to address the original issues might have introduced new problems that now need to be addressed. September 15: I received a major revision decision. 06 Required reviews completed; 2021. 12 reviews completed, 12. I spoke with Elsevier’s journal Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. 13 Required Reviews Completed 2022. 7 submit 2023. Reviewers should be asked to complete the review within 3 weeks, allowing for 4 weeks. The status changed to Under Review on August 30. Apr 13, 2018 · In the 2nd revision, I could not understand the editorial manager paper status meaning. A major revision would normally go back to the same reviewers and they would usually have as much time to review as the original submission. 24 major revision; 2021. The paper was reviewed and the reviewers asked for some changes. I have revised the paper according to the referees' comments. After a couple of months of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested”. Does that mean one of the reviewer reject the paper after major revision or he excused that he couldn't revise it and if that yes how can the reviewing completed then. 5 Minor revision 5. 5 change dates, status still under review 2023. 26 under review Jan. 10 accepted. ED1 said major, ED2 said minor. 同行评审，耗时最久，也是影响杂志社决定的关键环节。现投稿量激增，为保证质量，高水平的杂志均事先设in-house review，不过关的稿件被立即拒绝。 9. For each competed review, the selected reviewer Recommendation Term is displayed as a hyperlink to open the detailed review. 1 Required review completed 2022. Sep 15, 2021 · Hi, My manuscript is under the 3rd round of review, with R1 acceptance and R2 revision in the 2nd round. Dec 24, 2019 · I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. Now, again it Apr 13, 2018 · Only one reviewer was assigned after second revision and the paper is under review for last seven months. 9 - Required reviews completed 2021. Suggesting that the peer review process is not completed After 2 months of peer review process, the response was “moderate revision has been requested” and they told me that the new version is required within 1 month. Oct 12, 2021 · The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed to with editor again for last 10 days. I submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal in January 2020. What does this mean and what is the probability of rejection? Jan 18, 2020 · Once the AE has completed their review, they will make their decision on the manuscript and communicate it to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), changing the status to Decision in Process/Progress. So the editor may add another reviewer, to settle the case. The various status updates are as follows. The target number of required reviews has been completed, and the Handling Editor is considering the reviews. After round 2, ED1 said OK, ED2 said reject. 10 Under review 1. 18 Online Yes, original submission. Reconsider after major revision, appropriate to select if you Jan 1, 2023 · After a couple of months of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested”. Take the list of comments and suggestions and group them into categories, and then identify which require a minor revision and which require a major revision. Recommending Revision. After a month in peer review, i received comments of FIVE reviewers with a message from the academic editor that it needed a Major revision as reviewers had serious issues with the manuscript. Also, the statuses appeared very shortly after submission so I would be surprised if the reviewers had time to read and comment so fast. So, focus The editor gave the paper a "major revision" decision. After that, it changed to Editor Assigned, and has been the same since January 17. Really depends on the journal and the editor. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. One-and-a-half months after submitting the revised version, the status changed to Required Reviews Completed and has remained so for more than three weeks. How long does it take to give a decision after revision? Deciphering Manuscript Status Changes from ‘Required Reviews Completed’ to ‘Under Review’ The transition from ‘Required Reviews Completed’ to ‘Under Review’ in the manuscript submission process can be attributed to various reasons. Audit. 8 under review 9. The EiC makes the final decision on the manuscript. After the submission of the second revision, the status was Under Review for 20 days. Please note that the editor is still waiting for additional reports for your manuscript. 14 major revision. 13 required reviews completely In between, the status changed once from under review to required reviews completely Dec. 24 Under Review 2021. Still this step is usually faster because the reviewers don't have to be "re-identified" (assuming they agree to review; otherwise it could take longer for a myriad of reasons). The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed to with editor again for last 10 days. 20 under review, 3. 18 revision submitted to journal Jan. May 1, 2021 · The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. 24 Decision in process 4. 2. While I feel like we can respond to the comments, it doesn't look like the second reviewer would be convinced regardless of what we respond if he believes that database is invalid. 13 Reviews Completed 2021. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. After 4 months and in the second round of revision, I again received comments from four reviewers in that three of reviewers directly recommended that our paper should be accepted for publication, and a reviewer requested major revision. Jun 17, 2023 · My research field is pure mathematics. Address all points raised by the editor and reviewers. After 3 weeks my paper status was changed to "Required reviews completed" but after a day it was changed to "Under review" again. Jul 9, 2019 · In the first notification, I got a major revision. ' Is 8 days a long time to provide a final decision especially since the reviewers' responses were rather quick? Thank you for your answer. Rest assured that you will be notified once updates are available. 20, 4. 3 Revised 3. After second revision, the submission’s status changed from "major revision" to "with editor". As a peer reviewer, it is useful to learn about common reasons for a 'major revision' verdict. 19 major revision (30 d) Jan. Some journals have this weird category “reject with invitation to resubmit,” which functions as an alternative to “major revisions. Sep 19, 2017 · After a month, I received comments from three reviewers requesting minor revisions. One reviewer suggested minor corrections and one reviewer suggested major corrections. 11 Resubmit, With Editor 2022. 7 under review on the same day 2023. 'Major revisions' is one of the most common peer review decisions. SCOPE Advanced Materials publishes original materials science research in the form of short Communications, as well as Reviews, Progress Reports, and Research News articles. 11 Decision in process 2022. August 12: The status changed to Under Review. It usually happened because a major shortcoming in supporting a big conclusion wasn't adequately met with sufficient data. A second major revision was decided. The fate of the manuscript can not be predicted for a favorable acceptance since the status changed to Under Review. 29 Minor revision 4. There are so many submissions these days, sometimes editors have to reject good papers that could be strengthened after review. 06 under review; 2021. Now, again it The authors can complete a major revision within four months following the notification, while the authors can complete a minor revision within two months. It was not easy at all, sob sob. Three weeks later, the status has changed to Decision in Process. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. 22 accept. 12. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. They consider either being with the editor or the reviewers Apr 3, 2022 · 2021-12-30 under review 2022-01-06 under review 2022-02-23 under review 2022-03-22 required reviews completed 2022-03-28 decision in process 2022-04-03 Major revision (one minor revision + two major revisions) 2022-05-24 Resubmit 2022-06-30 Minor revision (format) 2022-07-06 Resubmit 2022-08-06 Minor revision (references) 2022-08-06 Resubmit after major revision submited in springer. 18 Major revision 2022. 02 Accept (Accepted without modifications) 2022. 05. Could you please explain to me what does this Jan 24, 2021 · I submitted my article to an Elsevier journal on August 5, 2020. Aug 5, 2023 · 04 Jul 2023 Reviews Completed 11 Jul 2023 Major Revision Translation: 13 Apr 2023 Submitted 18 Apr 2023 Editor Assignment Pending 02 May 2023 Under Review 11 May 2023 Reviews Completed 07 Jun 2023 Reviews Completed 26 Jun 2023 Reviews Completed 03 Jul 2023 Reviews Completed 04 Jul 2023 Reviews Completed 11 Jul 2023 Major Revision Dec 30, 2019 · Thus, it is difficult to tell how much time the final decision will take after a major revision. Mar 12, 2021 · This list will guide your revision of the paper. ” 即ち、Required Reviews Completedが律速段階で、Decision in ProcessではただChief-in-Editorの最終承認を待っているだけなのである。 それにしても、今回引き受けた原著の私の査読所要日数は5日。非採択のジャッジは著者に早く知らせるべきだろう。 Nov 26, 2022 · 10. After 10 months, I received a major revision and a minor revision decision by the [two] reviewers. Youll have 45 days to resubmit the revised manuscript for both a major or a minor revision. Now the system sends a link to the email, where you can directly see when the editor submitted the manuscript for review and how many reviewers were assigned. Nov 6, 2017 · Both the reviewers appreciated the work and had some questions and suggestions for improvement. 14 Reviews Completed 2021. Jan 31, 2021 · "Required Reviews Completed" Is that normal that this status lasts more than one month after Major Revision? that it takes 1 month after the reviews are completed Feb 28, 2022 · I have the same issues with Springer right now. 2 - Under Sep 6, 2021 · The paper is a 'revise and resubmit' (major revision) so I think it would only go back to the reviewers that already read it (max 3). Other statuses such as Invited, agreed to review, and Partial Review Saved are displayed as unlinked text. Now the editorial board will make a decision on your manuscript. Now, again it Jun 8, 2023 · Hi, We have submitted our manuscript to an Elsevier journal and it came back with major revision. While the specifics may vary, here are some common explanations for this status change: 1. After I submitted the Jan 5, 2021 · I had submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. 14 Major revision 3. Then, two weeks later it switched back to "passed technical checks, now May 8, 2020 · After two rounds of revision, the status has changed from ‘Required Review Completed’ to ‘Decision in Process. Finally, 18 days later, the status changed to "Under review. After three months of 'Under review', the status changed to 'Required review completed' a week ago, then it became 'With editor'. Sharing the timeline for everyone's reference: May 5, 2022 - Submitted May 6, 2022 - Under review June 23, 2022 - Reviews completed July 17, 2022 - Reviews completed (date updated once) July 18, 2022 - Major revision (defaulted to one month) Minor revision might also include providing more accurate explanations for some of the results or adding more results of control experiments that can be easily performed, that are not critical to supporting conclusions and that might not need further peer review for validation. The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed to with editor again for last Once something was called a major revision, but in my opinion it was minor - it took me only a few hours and the paper was accepted. 2021. However, I will say that any review I've submitted even close to that quickly can be summed up as "these glaring issues are so plainly fatal that I'm not going to go into smaller details as fixing the major comments will essentially require re-doing the entire project". Dec 19, 2019 · Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. 4 Editor assigned 3. However, the editor asked me to improve my abstract, introduction, and structure (as a second major revision). I know this as the Elsevier tracking status is still "under review" despite the reviewer has sent their report. 9. Nov 21, 2022 · Status of paper changed from "Awaiting recommendation" to "Peer review in Process", after Major revision and minor revision completed. Reddit. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. 14 Major Revision (Sent to 6 reviewers, received comments from 3 reviewers, 1 month for revision) 2022. 18 completed accept There was one reviewer who was very slow and after the major revision, they raised a repeated question and took another month to review. 9 editor assigned, 11. 7. You may also choose to state whether you opt in or out of the post-revision review too. 11 - Major revision (3 major revisions, 1 rejection, editor provided 20 days for major revision, requested 1-month extension) 2021. 21 Reviews Completed 2021. One needs to wait until the review reports are received. Ngày đăng: 07/12/2021. As of now (May 4, 2022), the review process is still marked as complete. After subsequent changes in the status, finally it showed “Reviews completed” on 5th of July. Oct 1, 2024 · Scroll down to and look for the journal metrics displayed after the Aims and Scope. Now, again it Editor Decision: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (20 Aug 2018) by Christine Stumpp Comments to the Author: Three referees posted their comments and evaluated the manuscript. 23 Required Reviews Completed 2022. It's possible they just had two days of downtime and just really got into doing the review. I revised the paper and sent it again. 9 under review 9. 15 Under review (actual review completed on 10. ’ Could you tell me if this is bad news or good news? Meaning of Decision in Process status after two rounds of revision Jun 27, 2015 · It's waiting for the editor to read the reviews and make a decision. However, two months after submitting the revisions, the status of the submission is still "Editor Assigned". 8 - Under review 2021. 14 Jun 20, 2017 · Dear all, I have submitted a manuscript in Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences on 20/04/2017. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. Minor revisions will include formatting or writing suggestions and are typically issues you can easily address. 5 mini revision 9. – Wrzlprmft ♦ Commented Jul 8, 2015 at 6:41 Oct 21, 2019 · Here are some excellent resources on how to respond to peer review comments that you will find helpful. The various status updates have been as follows. Revise and resubmit, however, is likely followed by a rejection. But sometimes the reviewers do not return to the Editor within the time Nov 20, 2024 · The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. A very painful situation for Oct 1, 2012 · In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing is needed. Where improvements are needed, a recommendation for major or minor revision is typical. Now, again it Mar 5, 2021 · Hello, everyone. I edited my manuscript as they suggested and submitted the revised version. 16 under review, 12. What could be the reason for the current status? Is the review process completed or are more reviewers required to [re (We had four reviewers. May 16, 2023 · Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. or does the editor might assign new reviewers to evaluate the revised manuscript. 7 Accept Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Jul 18, 2019 · I had submitted a paper to a Springer journal on 29th may 2019. Sep 20, 2022 · 6. Jul 3, 2023 · 2022. The most common reason for a manuscript to receive a major revision decision is that, while the topic is of interest and relevant to readers of the journal, the editors are unable to determine, from the existing version of the paper, whether the quality is sufficient for dissemination. After 1 week, the submission’s status changed to "under review" and two weeks after that the status changed to "with editor". If the peer reviewers have chosen to sign their reviews, their names will also appear. ) I know that revisions, both major and minor, hint at a higher chance of acceptance. Some rapid publication journals might give 10-15 days for reviewers to get back with their reports; however, for most journals the review time is longer. 4 Editor assigned 5. 7 revised manuscript submitted 9. I submitted on August 4th, and on the 5th it went under review. Peer review. These cover all aspects of materials science. Revise your paper. 16 Under Review 2021. The referees had different opinions about the quality of the manuscript. The paper was reviewed again and after a few months the status was shown as "reviews completed". September 4: The status changed to Reviews Completed. Apr 16, 2023 · Received first round of review comments on February 26, 2022, with major revisions suggested by five reviewers. Studies indicate that 21% of papers are rejected without review, and approximately 40% of papers are rejected after peer review. 7 submitted, 10. 6 reviews completed, 3. So, I shortened the title that does not change the intention of the paper. We tried to return rejections after one review if the concerns were conceptual (like limited novelty or lack of mechanistic insight for a new drug or targeted pathway), which would be hard to address sufficiently in a revision. May 13, 2023 · The second review took over half a year, but finally received today. On December 20, I submitted the revised article. 3 Accept Apr 15, 2021 · The editor gave us a major revision again. Based on the reviewers’ comments on your revised manuscript, the Associate Editor will make a recommendation to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) on whether to accept or reject your manuscript. Furthermore, you can get inspired by sample peer Dec 8, 2019 · I am not sure if the initial revision requested was a major revision or a minor revision. Now, again it Nov 2, 2020 · I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external reviewers again. Status of paper changed from "Awaiting recommendation" to "Peer review in Process", after Major revision and minor Aug 25, 2021 · I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. Why is there is no change in the status and how long it will take for the decision? Is it possible The first review was a major revision, then after submission of revision, within two months, I have received a minor revision. 17 Under Review 2022. 13, 4. 9 Reviews Completed 2021. 23 Required reviews completed 1. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). Any decision above 'major revision' is good, meaning you get a chance to improve the paper and hopefully get to full Nov 9, 2020 · I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. Reconsider after major revision, appropriate to select if you Jun 4, 2021 · Required reviews completed on 3. 4 Reviews Completed 2021. Plenty after one round of reviews, a couple after two rounds. Dec 4, 2017 · It is possible. All the best for your manuscript! Responding to peer review reports: Tips for authors; How to respond to a "revise and resubmit" decision from a journal: 10 Steps to a successful revision; How to respond to peer reviewer comments [Video] Oct 12, 2022 · After submitting, I received a major revision response in 15 days. 4. Two of the three reviewer completed their reviews within a week whereas the third one has taken about 2 months but still has not submitted his/her report which makes me think that this reviewer could be a new one. The status changed to The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed to with editor again for last 10 days. On December 5, I received a minor revision decision from one reviewer and a major revision decision from the other. 8. October 25: The status changed to Under Review. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to accept the manuscript, request Dec 29, 2017 · No way to tell not knowing the paper and the reviews, but absolutely do take the reviews into consideration and revise the paper accordingly. 16 Major Revision 2021. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting Mar 26, 2020 · I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using Editorial Manager on February 27, 2020. May 12, 2017 · The editor seemed to be very happy about the reviews as well. Regarding your question about the deadline assigned to reviewers, this would vary across journals. 9 Decision in process 2. Dec 1, 2021 · 2021. On December 22, the status changed to Under Review, and has remained so since then. Aug 24, 2021 · Hi. 20, editor has not processed it) 2022. Around 12 days after submission of my revised manuscript, the Editor sent me an email that the manuscript will be handled by the associate editor, but the status was still "With Editor". However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. 29 - Revision submitted to journal 2021. Subsequently, the date of the status changed to 13th July while the status remained the same. They have given a major revision decision twice. 10 Resubmitted 2022. I am getting anxious. The associate editor (AE) will now make a first decision on the manuscript and share this with you shortly. required review completed. This second revision has been completed by the reviewer 1 month ago, yet the editor has not even seen this report. Measurements used as the required reviews completed after revision with a training session on how to deal with all authors seem a full review: ethical considerations in. After half a year, we finally have good results. The paper status has changed from "major revision" to "with editor" after submitting the revised paper. 13 Editor Assigned 2021. 2022-11-09 Required reviews completed 2022-11-09 Major Revision (Revision time of 7 days, first and second reviewers agree to accept, third reviewer raises 3 questions) I have submitted a paper to an Elsevier journal and have already gone through 4 rounds of peer review and the editors have suggested a major revision each time. 20 under review; 2021. 13 editor assigned, 2. 1. 26 Under review 4. Jul 12, 2016 · I have submitted a paper to a journal, and received the editors decision (Major Revision). 03 Major revision, mainly regarding writing and language issues Returned for revision on January 17, 2021 May 9, 2023 · The paper was initially rejected after major revisions by AM, but then accepted by BAM in less than three months. ” I had this with one paper (Medical Care) and I think I had two of these rejections before the minor formatting revision pre-acceptance (longest submission process in my career; one year from first submission to acceptance). Some journals show the under review status from the time the paper gets to the editor in chief through to the reviewers. Feb 24, 2023 · Dec. Click the 'Review Time' link to see to see the average number of weeks it takes for a manuscript to reach first and final decision over the last several years. 10. July 1: I made the initial submission. Jul 1, 2018 · Reviewers, in fact, can recommend one of five decisions: a) publish as is, b) minor revision and publish, c) minor revision and re-review, d) major revision and re-review, and e) reject. September 6: The status changed to Reviews Completed. I then resubmitted the paper a month later. When revising your manuscript and responding to peer review comments you must: Thank the reviewers and editors for their time and comments. Is it a bad sign? Is it ok if I send them an email?. The author can then reply to each point in turn. As a result of this, you may receive a further round of comments from the same reviewers. I have not been asked for a revision. After 1 week later the paper status has changed to "under review" and then after two weeks later the paper status has changed to "with editor". Finally today, i. In most cases, authors may have only one opportunity of a major revision, while the AE can make repeated requests for minor revisions (though one or two minor revisions are usually enough). Any idea about this situation? Does this mean the SE and EIC are making the final decision or they need another reviewer to look at the manuscript? Peer-review Feb 4, 2021 · I have submitted my manuscript to a Springer journal. It means that the peer reviewer considers a manuscript suitable for publication if the authors rectify some major shortcomings. If the initial revision was a minor revision, the status usually changes to ‘With Editor’ or ‘Decision in Progress’. In this article, we have grouped b, c, and d together under the heading ‘reviewers’ manuscript (major) revision’. October 28: The status changed to Under Review Jul 26, 2024 · the reason for my question is to understand what are the circumstances that make the editor change the status from completed to assigned. Before revision the editor mentioned we are interested to publish work and comment for reviewer questions. Sep 16, 2021 · Are you a student at a higher institution or an early-career researcher who is striving to understand and master the peer review process so to increase the odds of getting a paper published in the Journal of Forestry Research or another reputable, peer-reviewed, scientific journal? In this paper, a young, senior editor provides a handbook of the peer review process based on his decadal Mar 11, 2021 · 8. The status "Required Reviews Completed" shows when the required number of reviews is reached. After the revision, the paper is sent back to the reviewers for checking the corrections and making their final decisions. 10 Revised 5. The specific review status is as follows: 2023. The identity of the authors and content of submissions must remain strictly confidential to those outside the review process until the manuscript is published. 30 under review 7. zcalac twla bgmub lefwrk mogw tdfogdv mfvi admm xjz ltmv